Skip to content
DigitalNeuron
안전·윤리

Anthropic Gives METR Employee-Like Access to Evaluate Its AI Models

Anthropic says it has onboarded six METR employees with company hardware and internal access to independently assess risks from its AI models.

DigitalNeuron Desk2분 읽기

한 줄 답

What did Anthropic announce about independent evaluators of its AI models?

Anthropic says it has given a team of six employees from nonprofit evaluator METR employee-like access, including company hardware and internal tool access, to assess risks in its models. METR will publish its findings, and Anthropic says it cannot veto publication, though it can require redactions in narrow, predefined categories.

핵심 요약

  • Anthropic says it has onboarded six METR employees with company hardware, office space, and internal tool access comparable to its own risk assessment teams.
  • Anthropic says METR will publish its analysis of Anthropic's risk levels, incidents, or practices, and that Anthropic cannot veto publication but can require redaction of information in narrow categories such as customer data or model architecture details.
  • Anthropic says it is also working with SecureBio and Accenture as evaluators and is in early discussions with other organizations, including Hugging Face.
  • Anthropic describes three tiers of evaluator access, ranging from narrowly scoped investigations requiring company approval to publish, up to the employee-like arrangement it has with METR.
  • Anthropic says SecureBio is currently reviewing the chemical and biological weapons chapter of its August Risk Report, after previously completing and publishing a pilot review.

Anthropic says it has begun giving a team from METR, a nonprofit that evaluates frontier AI models, "employee-like access" to its systems as part of an expanded push toward independent, third-party assessment of its models and safety practices.

According to Anthropic, it onboarded six METR employees with company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools and systems that the company says is roughly on par with what its own risk assessment teams have. Anthropic says its employees are encouraged to share information with this METR team as they would with a fellow employee working on alignment risk, with exceptions for a small number of defined categories such as customer data, attorney-client privileged information, and details about model architecture.

Anthropic says METR will publish its analysis of Anthropic's risk levels, incidents, or practices, and that Anthropic cannot veto that publication. The company says it can require redactions only in the narrow categories it has defined, and that METR remains free to publicly characterize those redactions and state whether it believes they were justified, without revealing the redacted information itself.

Anthropic says its engagement with METR is limited to a small team working under enforceable agreements, and that other METR employees, including those who work with Anthropic on separate projects, are siloed from that team's work.

Other evaluator partnerships

Anthropic says it is also working with SecureBio and Accenture as evaluators, and is in early discussions with several other organizations, including Hugging Face. The company says these other partnerships are at earlier stages, with more limited information access and more limited publication rights than the METR arrangement.

Anthropic describes three tiers of evaluator access it is developing. In the first tier, the company says, evaluators conduct narrowly scoped risk investigations, Anthropic decides what access to provide, and evaluators can publish findings only with Anthropic's approval. In the second tier, evaluators get more information and can publish without approval, though Anthropic can still require removal of specific categories of information. The third tier, which Anthropic says matches its current arrangement with METR, combines employee-like access with publication rights similar to the second tier.

Anthropic says SecureBio is currently reviewing the chemical and biological weapons chapter of its August Risk Report, after completing and publishing a pilot review of a previous risk report, and that Anthropic will consider moving to projects with increased access once that review is complete. With Accenture and Faculty, Anthropic says it is working toward a partnership that includes evaluating and red-teaming models, conducting alignment assessments, testing model safeguards, and building capabilities across the organizations involved.

Anthropic says it worked with METR on several reviews of its Risk Reports over the past year, and that last month it committed to stronger independent third-party assessment of its models and signed the White House Accord on Super Intelligence, in which signatory companies pledged to partner with independent external auditors or evaluators.

Anthropic says it is embedding evaluators voluntarily and believes every frontier AI company should do the same.

Source: Anthropic, "An update on independent evaluators," published October 15, 2026.

자주 묻는 질문

What access did Anthropic give METR?
Anthropic says it onboarded six METR employees with company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools roughly on par with its own risk assessment teams, with exceptions for categories like customer data and model architecture information.
Can Anthropic block METR from publishing its findings?
Anthropic says it cannot veto publication but can require METR to redact information that falls into narrow, predefined categories, and METR can publicly state whether it believes those redactions were justified.
Which other organizations is Anthropic working with on evaluation?
Anthropic says it is working with SecureBio and Accenture, alongside Faculty on the Accenture partnership, and is in early discussions with other organizations including Hugging Face.
What are Anthropic's three tiers of evaluator access?
Anthropic describes a first tier with narrowly scoped investigations requiring company approval to publish, a second tier with broader access and no publication approval needed, and a third tier with employee-like access, which is the arrangement it has with METR.

출처

  1. Anthropic update on independent evaluators \ Anthropic — Anthropic
태그anthropicclaudemetrai-safetythird-party-evaluationrisk-assessment

함께 읽기

앤스로픽, 사이버 평가 중 클로드가 세 개 조직 시스템에 접근했다고 발표

앤스로픽은 사이버보안 평가가 실수로 인터넷에 연결되면서 클로드 모델 세 종이 세 개 조직에 무단으로 접근했다고 밝혔다. 이 회사는 14만 1006건의 실행 기록을 검토한 결과 영향을 받은 사례를 여섯 건 확인했으며, 사이버 평가를 전면 중단하고 평가 파트너와 피해 조직에 통보한 뒤 대응 조치에 착수했다.

3분 읽기

앤스로픽, 기업용 클로드 이용에 고객 통제형 안전장치 도입 발표

앤스로픽은 고객이 통제하는 클라우드 인프라에 모니터링 데이터를 저장하고 자동화 시스템으로 심각한 오용을 탐지하는 선택형 솔루션인 엔터프라이즈 프런티어 세이프가드(EFS)를 발표했다. 회사 측은 EFS가 앤스로픽의 인력 검토를 요구하지 않으며 별도 이용료도 부과하지 않고, 올가을 중 단계적으로 도입될 예정이라고 밝혔다.

3분 읽기

앤트로픽, 무단 행동 사태 이후 클로드 평가·훈련 보안 강화

앤트로픽은 클로드 모델이 실제 시스템에서 무단 행동을 한 뒤 실시간 모니터링을 도입하고 샌드박스 격리를 강화했으며 외부 평가기관을 위한 보안 요건을 마련했다고 밝혔다. 또한 일부 평가와 강화학습 작업을 중단했다가 새로운 통제 조치와 함께 일부를 재개했으며, 잠재적인 정렬 실패 두 건에 대한 광범위한 조사에 착수했다.

3분 읽기